|>>||Anonymous 29oct2020(th)12:06 No.80720 OP |P1
|hex maniac peachypop34|
by peachypop 34 interactive ver
650x720, Compressed (Deflate). 2 frames, 30 fps (00:00).
Ver41, AS3. Network access: No. Text: No.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No.[find in archive]
|>>||Anonymous 1nov2020(su)02:57 No.80804 A |P2R1
|>>||Anonymous 1nov2020(su)13:02 No.80815 B |P3R2
|>>||Anonymous 1nov2020(su)16:48 No.80825 C |P4R3
|i remember that news article about Nintendo lawsuits to artists who draw hex maniac porn and another similar article from blizzard entertainment suing r34 creators using DMCA|
what do you think about it discuss here
|>>||Anonymous 2nov2020(mo)20:29 No.80848 D |P5R4
I don't think it's right for Nintendo to go after little guys making fan art (even if it's pornographic) but I also don't think it's right for artists to make money from Nintendo's characters. Especially if they paywall their porn "parodies".
If you piggyback on someone else's work then either don't expect to get paid for it OR obtain an official license - something Nintendo probably wouldn't grant for porn, meaning the only option is to make your porn and release it for free. I don't have a problem with asking for "support" (money) for future art as long as the future art is unknown and varied, meaning different parodies/characters, even some original characters. But if the artist continues to only piggyback on Nintendo's characters I can see how they would think it's a problem.
Imagine if you spend a lot of time and money on developing a world of characters, complete with relations/voices/backstories, and you do it so well that an entire generation of people gets emotionally invested into your characters. Then someone else comes along and starts drawing your imaginary girls topless, he only becomes noticed because he uses the characters you created, then he earns money and you get no cut. Maybe you even feel it is damaging your world or reputation. Some artists are asking for "support" and all they do is work on a single Nintendo-themed game that just grows larger in scope.
Granted Nintendo isn't some poor little indie dev and Nintendo's fantasy world has become what it is from several people's hard work, but maybe the little indie dev that feels the same way is just too little to fight against the beast that is unlicensed porn games hiding behind being a "parody". Even if he had the time and money to fight it would wreck his reputation because people just think porn ownership is outside the law. Granted, up to a certain point porn parodies are free advertisement for the small devs. But that doesn't apply to Nintendo, they don't care for the free marketing.
|>>||Anonymous 4nov2020(we)23:45 No.80870 B |P6R5
This. I wonder why people just think it's okay to make art of it, as long as it is not something Nintendo would ever do like porn.
Then again, I completely agree with:
+ Porn should be allowed and should be free only.
The point of r34 is not to make money living off it, it is a service to all mankind.
I think the optimal way would be to make your own (comissioned) porn and throw in a r34 every other time as a freebie from your own "free" time.
|>>||Anonymous 6jan2021(we)11:44 No.82519 E |P7R6
|>>||Anonymous 6jan2021(we)13:17 No.82522 F |P8R7
the fanarts, porn and not, end up being better for publicity and having almost no real downside for the rights holders other than maybe people associating it with porn and that's only a bad thing if you're a puritan cunt who whines about porn existing
|>>||Anonymous 9jan2021(sa)14:33 No.82624 E |P9R8